Effective 6 October 2026. Readers can report factual mistakes, unsupported claims, inaccurate attribution, broken source links and outdated information to dailytrendhub365@gmail.com.
What to send
Use “Correction” in the subject and include the article URL, the passage concerned and what you believe should change. Link to a reliable source when possible. A clear description is helpful even if you do not have every document needed to resolve the issue.
Please do not send passwords, financial account details or unrelated personal documents. If your concern involves someone else’s personal information, describe the issue without repeating more of that information than necessary.
How a report should be assessed
- Identify the exact claim and the date or context in which it was published.
- Check the cited source and relevant primary evidence. Ask for clarification when the report cannot be understood from the information provided.
- Correct the text, headline, table, image caption or other affected part when the evidence establishes an error.
- Add a visible dated correction note when the change materially affects the article’s meaning or a reader’s decision.
A report is not automatically proof that a claim is wrong. Where evidence remains uncertain, the article should describe that uncertainty or the unsupported claim should be withheld. We do not publish a guaranteed response deadline.
Corrections, updates and minor edits
- Material correction: an earlier statement was wrong or misleading. A note should explain what was corrected and when, without unnecessarily repeating harmful or private details.
- Update: circumstances changed after accurate information was published. Identify the new information and its date.
- Minor edit: spelling, punctuation, formatting or a repaired link that does not alter meaning may be corrected without a separate note.
Changing an article’s date alone is not an adequate explanation of a material error. A major rewrite should also be distinguished from a routine formatting change.
When an article cannot be made reliable
If the central claim cannot be verified or a substantial part of an article is unreliable, withdrawal from public view may be appropriate while it is assessed. Replacing, consolidating or removing content should not be used to hide a material correction that readers need to understand.
If your concern remains unresolved
Reply in the same email thread, identify the point still in dispute and include any additional evidence. For a privacy or attribution concern, also say which information or original work is involved. Do not post private correspondence publicly merely to submit a correction request.
This policy describes how reports and corrections are to be handled. It does not imply that every historical article has been independently verified.